Critically Discuss The Psychological Theories Related To Attachment And Apply The Understanding To Social Work/social Welfare Practice.

ATTACHMENT : THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS Although babies tramp communicate many of their whole stepings right from the initiation , their social lives change rather dramatically as they hap emotionally to their c begivers . John Bowlby (1969 ) uses the term to describe the strong emotional ties that we feel for the special large number in our lives . According to Bowlby (1969 , people who are securely take pleasure in their interactions and feel comforted by their partner s presence in clock of stress or uncertainty Developmentalists have long debated the retort that people are especially responsive and philiaate to the psyche who feeds them . There are four influential theories of attachment : psychoanalytical theory , learning theory , cognitive-developmental theory and ethological theory psychoanalytic TheoryAccording to Freud , young babys are oral creatures who derive satisfaction from suction and mouthing objects and should be threaded to any person who provides oral pleasure . Since it is commonly m separates who pleasure oral infants by provide them , it seemed logical to Freud that the breed would become the baby s primary object of security and affectionateness , particularly if she was relaxed and generous in her feeding practicesErik Erikson also believed that a mother s feeding practices influence the strength or security of her infant s attachments . However , he claimed that a mother s overall responsiveness to her child s needs is more important than feeding itself . According to Erikson , a caregiver who consistently responds to all an infant s needs fosters a sense of trust in other people , whereas unresponsive or inconsistent caregiving breeds mistrust . He adds that children who have learned not to trust caregivers during infancy may come to avoid close mutual-trust relationships throughout lifeLearning Theory : Rewardingness Leads to LoveFor quite an different reasons , some learning theorists have also take for granted that infants become to persons who feed them and gratify their needs . Feeding was theory to be particularly important for two reasons (Sears , 1994 .

First , it should suck out positive responses from a contented infant such as smiles and coos which are likely to increase a caregiver s affection for the baby Second , feeding is often an occasion when mothers can provide an infant with many comforts - food , eagerness , tender touches , soft , reassuring vocalizations , changes in scenery , and even a dry diaper - all in integrity sitting . Over time , then , an infant should come to associate his mother with pleasure or pleasurable sensations , so that the mother herself becomes a rich commodity . Once the mother (or any other caregiver has attained this status as a secondary reinforcer , the infant is he or she will now do whatever is necessary (smile , promulgate , coo babble , or follow ) in to attract the caregiver s attention or to remain near this valuable and rewarding individualCognitive-Developmental TheoryCognitive-developmental theory has little to say about which adults are most likely to appeal to infants , but it does remind us of the holistic character of development by suggesting that the ability to fake attachment depends , in part , on the infant s level...If you necessitate to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper