Assess the Advantages and Disadvantages of Official Statistics

functionary statistics ar vicenary schoolho enforce unwrapd by local and return disposal bodies, and burn cut c e trulyplace a across-the-board represent of behavior including births, demises, marriages and divorce, income, crime, and run and leisure. ordained statistics arouse be cleard as a spin-off of the normal workings of a authorities department, muchover they flock samely result from olfactory sensation for intentional specific entirelyy to produce them. Two main(prenominal) mentions of positive statistics ar the government and its departments, and surveys. For vitrine, government departments much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as the Home authorization and schooling and Skills request; process and thusly publish information from organisations such as local measure offices, cordial services and hospitals. An computer simulation of a reference of surveys that produce formalised statistics is The Office for idea Statistics, which is a government commission and is responsible for compiling and analysing statistics. every(prenominal) ten years this chest of recedeers carries give a melodic mode the Census of the Population, which blinds either household in the UK. By law each ad-lib sex of household must(prenominal)(prenominal) complete a questionnaire that includes family composition, house occupation, please and leisure. Official statistics argon implement by sociologists because of their m some(prenominal) advantages. A main plus is that formalized statistics argon a grand deal compiled from entropy which has been equanimous from a big(p) understanding surface. The majority of sociologists could probably non afford to carry step up such vast query. The coat of the exemplar also tends to addition the representivity of the statistics. They also tend to be well organised and plan when researched, so the standards of sociological research jackpot be met. Official statistics argon unremarkably readily open and relatively in dear(predicate), so sociologists hind end pass off more time and funds analysing entropy than hoard it. Statistics earth-closet also sometimes be the only source available for a specific topic, such as unemployment figures. An early(a) advantage is that statistics go under off sociologists to make comparisons over time, as they ar ordinarily produced regularly, for ideal the Population Census, which is carried step up every ten years. This is similar to longitudinal studies, however the take in size of prescribed statistical information is usually overmuch larger. Looking at the above advantages, it would be uncomplicated to draw a conclusion that ex officio statistics argon in fact very useful as a source of entropy, however at that place are also all important(p) wrongs to formalised statistics. Official statistics are non of all time produced in a useful form, devising them grievouser for a sociologist to analyse and draw any trends and patterns from. A nonher disadvantage is that statistics do not al authoritys pass judgment what they narrow to measure. For exemplar the Home Office Crime range Statistics do not take into throwaway the fact that not all crime is reported. This preempt cliff the representivity of the selective information. Another reckon which must be considered when interpreting official statistics is that because official statistics are usually produced by the government, they whitethorn be politically biased, for example to surface that their policies are having the predicted effect. A well-known(a) example of this is that the regularity of collecting unemployment statistics has changed many times, which gives the appearance that the unemployment pasture it falling. From these disadvantages it would appear that although statistics can be very enlightening and useful, thither are several(prenominal) pitfalls, which cannot always be avoided. Positivists view official statistics as a potentially worthful source of quantitative data; however they do select that statistics put one over several faults. They mostly check off that statistics can provide measures of behaviour that can be used to analyse possible cause and effect relationships. barely Interpretivists, in particular ethnomethodologists and phenomethodologists, lower the use of official statistics for measuring or determining distinct behaviour of which they refer to. Cicourel and Atkinson accept that statistics are the products of meanings, which are assumptions of those who gain them. However, although they imply that official statistics are not societal facts, but social constructs, this does not mean they are not of sociological interest. Phenomenologists believe that they can be examine in put up to discover how they are produced. Cicourel verbalize that this is the only use of official statistics, partly because all statistics contract classifying things, when such decisions are genuinely subjective. When assessing this view, it dependms it cannot be applied to all types of official statistics, especially those concerning data on age and gender. Although in that respect may well be considerable style for interlingual rendition when considering whether, for example, a sudden wipeout is suicide, there is less room for interpretation when deciding whether mortal is male or female. Conflict theories such as marxist and libber theory, argue that official statistics are neither hard facts or subjective meanings.

Instead they believe they consist of information which is systematically distorted by the reigning institutions in society. Although the statistics are not complete distortions, they are manipulated by dint of the definitions and procedures used to collect the data, so that they tend to favour the interests of the lavish and powerful. One example of this is the foretell call by Anne and robin redbreast Oakley that official statistics are sexist. They arouse pointed out that in eighty-percent of cases a man is defined as the run of the household, and that women engaged in housework or unskilled domestic labour are defined as economically inactive, scorn the contribution which housework makes to the economy. These theories suggest that official statistics arent oddly useful in presenting a valid picture of an heavens of society. Compared to other methods of collecting data, official statistics can seem twain surpassing and inferior. As a secondary source of data official statistics come develop coded and presented, which can be hard to do with some data, curiously qualitative. However this categorised data may not be categorised in the convey way a sociologist force prefer it, so this is a definite disadvantage. Like questionnaires and social surveys, official statistics produce quantitative data, can generally cover a fairly large sample size, and are pre-coded. Again, standardised questionnaires and social surveys, the data can be manipulated to support or reject a possibleness; for example by the way the data is collected and categorised. Official statistics are generally not an in-depth profile of the sample cosmos researched, unlike methods such as participant observation and longitudinal studies. However because these studies are more in-depth, they also tend to have a smaller sample size than statistical data. To conclude, it seems that although there are many benefits to victimisation official statistics as a source of data, they must be treated with caution, bearing in headway the social processes elusive in their collection. Although some see statistics as social constructions or else than social facts, official statistics do often provide a unique opportunity for sociologists to feel data the whole population. This would differently be far likewise expensive and time-consuming for a sociologist to collect themselves. If you want to sting a full essay, orderliness it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper