Research on Passive Euthanasia & Infant's Down Syndrome

An introduction to Down's Syndrome, views of unresisting euthanasia, and sound considerations atomic number 18 presented followed by conclusions.

Yang, Rasmussen, and Friedman (2002) reported on Down's syndrome and mortality order in the USA from 1983 to 1997. These authors stu peter outd data from the U.S. Centers for Disease watch and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics. Down's syndrome had a prevalence of one in 800 live births and stillbirths. It is the most commonly determine cause of mental retardation. The most common causes of destruction in those with Down's syndrome are inwrought nerve centre defects and respiratory infections. In races opposite than white, rates for obesity and congenital anomalies other than congenital heart defects are higher in those with Down's syndrome. The fact that at that place is an advance in then median age at death for whiles and not blacks or other races regarding those with Down's syndrome with congenital heart defects, points to the chess opening that treatment of the defects varies according to race.

Garrard and Wilkinson (2005) reported that in 2001, passive euthanasia was considered by an Ethics Task Force established by the European Association of Palliat

ive tutelage (EAPC). After reviewing arguments such as euthanasia is wrong, passive euthanasia is not euthanasia since it does not cause death, and possible aver negative consequences of accepting passive euthanasia as a category, the tack force ruled that passive euthanasia as an expression is a contradiction in terms and wherefore it does not exist. Alternatively, Garrard and Wilkinson concluded that the category of passive euthanasia should not be abandoned and it is important to understand euthanasia reasons for withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment to be sure that they are distinguished from other reasons. This is an important point since as Yang et al. (2002) noted, at that place may be reasons such as race or ethnicity that are related to euthanasia decisions.

Fuch-Berman (1983) presented the issue of euthanasia from a legal perspective. A Missouri bill required the macrocosm of lifesaving measures for newborns that are handicapped. The Handicapped babes Protection Act say that to cover treatment of food to a handicapped newborn is a felony and parent wishes are not considered. Legislators supporting this bill referred to the allow of handicapped newborns die as passive euthanasia.

Rachels (2002) presented the view that there is no difference amid letting soul die and killing them, and therefore there is no difference between active and passive euthanasia. Rachels stated that when a medical student actively disconnects a machine and patient dies, this is considered active, however when a doctor lets a patient die, this is also an action. Further this author stated that in some cases it is more humane to kill someone than to let them die. Thus, Rachels concluded, "active euthanasia is morally preferable to passive euthanasia" (p. 198). Rachels brought up the example of the infant with Down's syndrome who also has congenital defects such as intestinal obstructions. An operation is required if the infant is to live and at times
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!