State And Federal Spending For Higher Education

When Richard K . Vetter , in his book Going Broke by Degree : Why College Costs Too Much , argued that responsibility and national spending for higher(prenominal) reading should be phased step forward , I was completely taken aback . I could non associate such an adverse reaction towards a compassionate curriculum with a highly competent professional as a professor at Ohio University An array of numerical data may have influenced him to make such a ending , but I think it possible that he readiness have evaluated the program from a wrong perspective . It is both that , or he is guilty of indiscretion as a consequence of racial prejudice . I will drop aside whatever biases he might have for the hour , concentrate my efforts in refuting the reasons that he had given , and take the depraved view that state and federal funding for higher education should non be phased out .It encourages low academicianian standards . In answer to this claim , let us consider matchless of the seven basic assumptions proposed by D . Bruce Johnstone as the seeming stimuli for the Higher Education Act of 1965 the law which authorized federal aid to students . I am referring specifically to his assumption 5 : Federal aid to students is given without regard to academic name or performance He explains that federal funding is found on the financial need of students , not on academic performance , since it is already assumed that students coming from low-income families do not usually do well in examinations . He asserts that the federal aid program was envisioned , primarily , to encourage indirect school graduates who come from poor families students who are also more(prenominal) likely to come from the minority groups , to enroll in colleges and universities and stick with post- utility(prenominal) education It would appear , therefore , that the moment these target secondary school graduates set foot in the country s colleges and universities half(a) of the objective of the program is achieved .

This is because of the findings that most of those who graduate from our secondary schools peculiarly those who come from poor and minority families , are lured away from higher education by job opportunities and the prospect of helping their families economically . Once these students are already in colleges and universities , periodic evaluations could be done , weeding out the undesirables as well as the abject cases , and retaining only those who have become fully adjusted to college vivification , obtaining the necessary grade requirements in the process . Guiding these last students towards the completion of their higher education represents the final half of the program . Expounding further , he asserts that doing away with the federal aid program , or even raising the minimum academic requisites relative thereto , would amount to discrimination against poor and minority familiesIt negatively affects economic growth . Here , Johnstone s assumption 2 seems an appropriate response : The greets of higher education are appropriately shared by taxpayers (both state and federal , parents students , and philanthropists The cost of education includes tuition fees and other school-related expenses , as...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper