What Napster failed to appreciate is that if anyone wants to use a secure song in any public venue, they must get-go obtain rights from the publisher and in some cases from the music nock that produced the song. The problem that the music industry had with Napster was that it was an automated way to copy copyrighted material. At its height, there were more that 10 one million million registered users at Napster. These users made tens of thousands of copies of copyrighted songs every day with out(p) gainful any royalties to the music industry or the artists.
Napster's defense was that the files were ain files that people maintained on their own machines. Therefore, Na
The Courts disagreed with Richardson.
In July 2001, a judge issued an injunction edict Napster's servers shut down to prevent further copyright violations. Napster eventu everyy agreed to pay $26 million in damages for past copyright infringements, and an advance against future licensing royalties of $10 million.
Napster is now back in business. Napster is one of many legal, pay-per-song music-download Internet sites. Meanwhile, file sharing continues across the Internet. Chris Sherman (2000) writes in Online that Napster represents just the tip of the crisphead lettuce of massive, inevitable change that's going to affect virtually all aspects of information search and retrieval (Sherman, 2000, 16). The genie is truly out of the bottle, and it seems unlikely that the music industry will ever amply recover.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment