Briefing The Case

TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTS requester Leegin Creative Leather Products , a manufacturer of women s accessories under the brand name Brighton , entered into a dependable minimum worth agreements with its retailer , which includes herein respondent , PSKS , Inc . suppliant avers that such determine agreements intend to encourage com request among retailers in the areas of customer service and product promotion . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their prescribed minimum price . by and by being dropped by Leegin as one of its retailers , PSKS d a lawsuit , arguing that Leegin violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act by engaging in anticompetitive price fixing . The District judicature decided in favor of PSKS citing Dr . Miles Medical Co . v . John D . Park Sons Co , which held that mandate price agreements are per se illegal under the Sherman Act . prayer , in an appeal to the U .S .

Court of Appeals for the Fifth perimeter , argued that this recipe was based on outdated economics and contended that a the rule of reason is a better legal depth psychology Petitioner further claimed that price minimums will only be held illegal when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court rule in favor of the district court hence , this supplicant for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to treated compulsory minimum prices for its productsRULENo , it is not illegal for a manufacturer to inured ma! ndatory minimum prices for its products . Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very electrical outlet , combination in...If you want to get a full essay, redact it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper