Ethnography is naturally unprotected to partiality. The very nature of civilizations development by dint of competition of territory and customs means that historical depictions of foreign peoples argon inherently vulnerable to subjectivity. Neither Sima Qians nor Herodotuss works are exempt from this condition as twain display indications of subjective views towards foreign peoples. However, the way in which they depict foreigners still differs greatly between them through the manner in which they each address the foreign peoples customs, slipway of governing, military tendencies and origins. Specifically, the greatest difference emerges in the way that Sima Qian depicts the Xiongnu with great rationality as opposed to the way in which Herodotus sensationally depicts the Synthians.
The differences in language and vocabulary using upd by Sima Qian and Herodotus when referring to foreigners are the first general indications of Herodotus tendency to sensationalize his portrayals in contrast to Sima Qians more rational renderings.
Throughout Herodotuss The Histories, but in particular when referring to the Scythians, exaggerated vocabulary and phrases such as fit to them (Herodotus, 240) and have managed one thing (Herodotus, 255) are used consistently. This use of diction adds a tone to Herodotuss writings that shine his personal views of superiority over the Scythians thus making his approach to depicting them a lot more dramatic and ballyhoo artist as opposed to the more rational approach of Sima Qians. In contrast, Sima Qian makes no obvious change to the use of his vocabulary when he begins to depict the Xiongnu and thus the vocabulary never appears to be grand by melodramatic propensities. For example, when mentioning an incursion by the Xiongnu, Sima Qian soley refers to them as having...If you destiny to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment